Does 1 - 5 Pulse Flow Settings Equal 1LPM to 5LPM

Does 1 - 5 Pulse Flow Settings Equal 1LPM to 5LPM

No. Pulse flow settings of portable oxygen concentrator (POC) are not directly comparable to continuous-flow LPM ratings. Oxygen flow is measured in liters per minute (LPM) for continuous flow and milliliters per minute (ml/min) for pulse flow. Thus the pulse flow settings of 1-5 do not mean 1LPM to 5LPM

Pulse Flow:


  • Pulse flow delivers oxygen in short bursts triggered by your inhalation, timed to match your breaths. 
  • Flow settings indicate the amount of oxygen delivered per breath. 
  • It's measured in milliliters per minute (ml/min). 
  • Example: On setting 5, the POC gives 1,000 ml/min. If you breathe 10 times a minute, you get 100 ml per inhalation. If you breathe 30 times a minute, it adjusts to 33 ml per breath to keep giving 1000 ml/min.

Continuous Flow:


  • Deliver oxygen continuously, regardless of your breathing pattern.
  • Settings indicate the flow rate of oxygen delivered per minute.
  • It's measured in liters per minute (LPM).
  • Example: A setting of "5 LPM" delivers 5 liters of oxygen per minute continuously.

How to Match Pulse Flow to Continuous Flow

To match these, we need to consider how we breathe.

1. How We Breathe In and Out

When we breathe, we spend twice as long exhaling as inhaling. This means we only use about 1/3 of each breath to get oxygen into our body.

2. How the Lungs Use Oxygen

Only about 2/3 of the oxygen we inhale actually reaches our lungs where it can be used by our body. The other 1/3 stays in your airways and is exhaled.

how does our body use oxygen

This means if we think of a continuous flow of 1 liter of air per minute, we breathe in oxygen for about 1/3 of that minute. And in the time of that 1/3 minute, only 2/3 of the oxygen gets to our lungs for gas exchange.

So, the actual amount of oxygen used by our lungs is calculated like this: 1 Liter x 1/3 (time spent inhaling) x 2/3 (the part that reaches the lungs). This equals 0.222 liters or 222 milliliters.

Pulse flow levels are typically designed to match continuous flow levels:

  • Level 1: 222 ml/min, equivalent to 1 LPM, (1L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =222 ml/min)
  • Level 2: 444 ml/min, equivalent to 2 LPM, (2L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =444 ml/min)
  • Level 3: 666 ml/min, equivalent to 3 LPM, (3L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =666 ml/min)
  • Level 4: 888 ml/min, equivalent to 4 LPM, (4L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =888 ml/min)
  • Level 5: 1,111 ml/min, equivalent to 5 LPM, (5L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =1,111 ml/min)

Thus if a device's total voulme is around 1,111 ml/min, it can say an oxygen supply equivalent to a 5 LPM continuous flow.

How to Judge the Oxygen Production Capacity of A POC

When we want to judge the oxygen production capacity of a portable oxygen concentrator and ensure that its pulse flow can provide sufficient oxygen, we only judge by its maxium oxygen output or Total Volume per Minute (TVPM), rather than the number of flow sets.

Take our POC with 5 pulse dose settings as an example, our POC at the highest setting produces about 1000ml/min, around 1,111 ml/min (5L x 1/3 min x 2/3 =1,111 ml/min), almost equivalent to a 5 LPM continuous flow.

Portable Oxygen Conentartor with 1-5 Flow Settings

$1,699.00

Flow Rate Table

Flow Settings

O2 Volume

Equivalent to Continuous Flow

1

210 ml/min

1 LPM

2

420 ml/min

2 LPM

3

630 ml/min

3 LPM

4

840 ml/min

4 LPM

5

1,000 ml/min

5 LPM

Portable Oxygen Conentartor with 1-5 Flow Settings

$1,699.00

Flow Rate Table

Flow Settings

O2 Volume

Equivalent to Continuous Flow

1

210 ml/min

1 LPM

2

420 ml/min

2 LPM

3

630 ml/min

3 LPM

4

840 ml/min

4 LPM

5

1,000 ml/min

5 LPM

Note:

Doctors do not know how each manufacturer sets the pulse flow rate, so we can only rely on ourselves to identify it.

share this article

Related Articles

differences between pulse dose and continuous flow

Pulse Dose Deliver vs. Continuous Flow

prescription of oxygen therapy

A Guide to Optimal Oxygen Use

5 comments

  • Esto es pensado que el 100 por ciento del pulsado se aprovecha.
    Porque si aplicamos la misma regla de aprovechamiento caemos en valores de menos litros de suministro.
    ? Cuál es entonces el razonamiento?

    David Gallegos Casillas
  • Too expensive

    Grady Ford
  • KUDOS to getwellue! You have the best information of all the sites I have visited. Thanks so much.

    Dusty Pilot
  • I really appreciate the clear explanation of the actual performance of the settings.

    I have another major brand that was misleading by being intentionally vague about the settings— like the 5 setting version of the same model was somehow better—- and more expensive. I thought I was buying a 5 liter equivalent I’ll be back when it dies.
    Gregory Jones
  • Hello, i feel that i saw you visited myy webb site thus i got here to
    go back the desire?.I am attemplting to to find issues to enhance my
    web site!I guess its good enough to make use of some of your ideas!! https://www.waste-NDC.Pro/community/profile/tressa79906983/

    https://www.waste-NDC.Pro/community/profile/tressa79906983/

Leave a comment